Received 25.12.2023, Revised 20.03.2024, Accepted 27.06.2024
Examining the impact of digital technologies on advanced economies is crucial. The COVID-19 pandemic underscores their role in economic stability, emphasising the need to assess digitization’s relationship with economic growth using regression models, which was the aim of this study. Analytical and inductive methods were utilised to determine the basic set of digitalization indicators. Through expert evaluation, a basis of five key indicators was formed: internet coverage level, level of financial activity online, level of digital skills development among the population, degree of integration of digital technologies into government processes, and volume of online purchases. To isolate the most influential factors, an experimental approach involving the construction of a linear regression model and the partial use of data augmentation statistical methods based on autoregression was employed. The results indicate that the most significant factor is the level of financial activity online. However, negative effects are observed in certain aspects of digitalization, such as online purchases, which require further analysis. The inclusion of state factors in the model proved to be crucial for accurately assessing the impact of digitalization on the economy. This underscores the need for further research in this area to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which digital technologies influence economic development and to develop development strategies. The overall results confirm theoretical concepts regarding the positive correlation between digitalization and economic development but also indicate the need for refinement and additional research into the specific mechanisms of this impact. This opens the way for further detailed evaluation of potential sub-indicators of this metric and a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between digitalization and the economy. In the public sector, these data can serve as a practical basis for policy adjustments related to the implementation of new technologies aimed at improving the economic situation
transformation; digital economy; digitization; macroeconomic indicators; coefficient of determination
[1] Cheng, C., & Huang, H. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of regional economic growth factors in digital economy based on the deep neural network. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), article number 1121886. doi: 10.1155/2022/1121886.
[2] Çolak, A.B. (2021). An experimental study on the comparative analysis of the effect of the number of data on the error rates of artificial neural networks. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(1), 478-500. doi: 10.1002/er.5680.
[3] Database. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database.
[4] Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.
[5] Ding, C., Liu, C., Zheng, C., & Li, F. (2022). Digital economy, technological innovation and high-quality economic development: Based on spatial effect and mediation effect. Sustainability, 14(1), article number 216. doi: 10.3390/su14010216.
[6] Fernández-Portillo, A., Almodóvar-González, M., & Hernández-Mogollón, R. (2020). Impact of ICT development on economic growth. A study of OECD European Union countries. Technology in Society, 63, article number 101420. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101420.
[7] Gomes, S., Lopes, J.M., & Ferreira, L. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on economic growth: The case of OECD countries. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 23(6), article number eRAMD220029. doi: 10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMD220029.en.
[8] Khovrat, A., Kobziev, V., Nazarov, A., & Yakovlev, S. (2022). Parallelization of the VAR algorithm family to increase the efficiency of forecasting market indicators during social disaster. In IX international scientific conference “Information technology and implementation” (IT&I-2022) (pp. 222-233). Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
[9] Kwilinski, A., Vyshnevskyi, O., & Dzwigol, H. (2020). Digitalization of the EU economies and people at risk of poverty or social exclusion. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(7), article number 142. doi: 10.3390/jrfm13070142.
[10] Li, C., & Qiao, L. (2022). Rapid prediction algorithm for economic development trend of tourism using Markov chain. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1), article number 8726206. doi: 10.1155/2022/8726206.
[11] Magoutas, A.I., Chaideftou, M., Skandali, D., & Chountalas, P.T. (2024). Digital progression and economic growth: Analyzing the impact of ICT advancements on the GDP of European Union countries. Economies, 12(3), article number 63. doi: 10.3390/economies12030063.
[12] Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), article number 101856. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856.
[13] Núñez-Canal, M., de Obesso, M.L.M., & Pérez-Rivero, C.A. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, article number 121270. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270.
[14] Oloyede, A.A., Faruk, N., Noma, N., Tebepah, E., & Nwaulune, A.K. (2023). Measuring the impact of the digital economy in developing countries: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Heliyon, 9(7), article number E17654. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17654.
[15] Petkovski, I., Fedajev, A., & Bazen, J. (2022). Modelling complex relationships between sustainable competitiveness and digitalization. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(2), 79-96. doi: 10.7441/joc.2022.02.05.
[16] Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S.E. (2020). Sustainable economic growth in the European Union: The role of ICT, venture capital, and innovation. Review of Financial Economics, 38(1), 34-62. doi: 10.1002/rfe.1064.
[17] Tănase, F.-D., Demyen, S., Manciu, V.-C., & Tănase, A.-C. (2022). Online education in the COVID-19 pandemic – premise for economic competitiveness growth? Sustainability, 14(6), article number 3503. doi: 10.3390/su14063503.
[18] Tiutiunyk, I., Drabek, J., Antoniuk, N., Navickas, V., & Rubanov, P. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on macroeconomic stability: Evidence from EU countries. Journal of International Studies, 14(3), 220-234. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-3/14.
[19] Török, L. (2024). The relationship between digital development and economic growth in the European Union. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering. doi: 10.1556/1848.2024.00797.
[20] Yakovlev, S., Khovrat, A., & Kobziev, V. (2023). Using parallelized neural networks to detect falsified audio information in socially oriented systems. In X international scientific conference “Information technology and implementation” (IT&I-2023) (pp. 220-238). Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
[21] Zatonatska, T., Klapkiv, Y., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Fedirko, O. (2022). Forecasting of the employment rate in the EU ICT field. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 25(3), 7-25. doi: 10.18778/1508-2008.25.19.
[22] Zhang, J., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., & Geng, Y. (2022a). Digital economy: An innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, article number 106821. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106821.
[23] Zhang, J., Zhao, W., Cheng, B., Li, A., Wang, Y., Yang, N., & Tian, Y. (2022b). The impact of digital economy on the economic growth and the development strategies in the post-COVID-19 era: Evidence from countries along the “belt and road”. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, article number 856142. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856142.
[24] Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Wan, X., & Yao, Y. (2021). Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China. PLoS ONE, 16(9), article number e0257365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257365.
[25] Zhang, X., Wan, G., Zhang, J., & He, Z. (2020). Digital economy, financial inclusion and inclusive growth. China Economist, 15(3), 92-105. doi: 10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2020.05.07.