Українська
Malyarets, L., Iastremska, O., Barannik, I., Iastremska, O., & Larina, K.
(2024).
Assessment of structural changes in stable development of the country.
Economics of Development,
23(2),
8-16.
https://doi.org/10.57111/econ/2.2024.08
English
Article
Assessment of structural changes in stable development of the country
Received 10.01.2024, Revised 18.04.2024, Accepted 27.06.2024
Abstract
The issue of structural changes is poorly researched and unresolved in the assessment of sustainable development in the countries of the world and remains relevant for many years. The purpose of the article was to clarify the content of the issue of structural changes and justify the method of assessing the structural dynamics of the country’s stable development to ensure its objectivity and reliability. To achieve the goal, an abstract-logical method was used to determine the degree of solving the problem of assessing structural changes in the stable development of countries and to develop a structural dynamic benchmark. The method of constructing an integral key figure of structural dynamics was used to determine the level of a country’s stable development using the example of Ukraine. The regression analysis was used to determine the dependence of the structural dynamics of stable development on main factors. It was found that the results of the structural dynamics assessment of the stable development depend on the structural dynamic benchmark, as the state is compared with it. This structural dynamic benchmark of the stable development of countries is the main assessment tool. The new structural dynamic benchmark for the stable development of developing countries is substantiated. In the calculation of the integral key figure of the structural dynamics of stable development, the base rates of macroeconomic key figures that reflect this development were used. It is proposed to determine the factors influencing the integral key figure of the structural dynamics of stable development. The range of [0.28; 0.35] represents the low level of structural dynamics in Ukraine’s stable development. The practical value of the proposed approach to structural change assessment in the country’s stable development lies in the possibility of rapid diagnosis and monitoring of these changes for early correction of the negative consequences of phenomena that slow down development
Keywords:
sustainable development; structural dynamic benchmark; macroeconomic key figures; integral key figure; determination of influencing factors
- 1,498 Views
- Read article
References
[1] Anton, C.E., Zamfirache, A., Albu, R.-G., Suciu, T., Sofian, S.M., & Ghiță-Pîrnuță, O.A. (2024). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Romanian entrepreneurs’ funding sources in the present-day context of sustainability. Sustainability, 16(2), article number 654. doi: 10.3390/su16020654.
[2] Bartelings, H., & Philippidis, G. (2024). A novel macroeconomic modelling assessment of food loss and waste in the EU: An application to the sustainable development goal of halving household food waste. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 45, 567-581. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.025.
[3] Bogolyubov, V. (Ed.). (2018). Sustainable development strategy. (2nd ed.). Kyiv: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine.
[4] Butlin, J. (1989). Our common future. Journal of International Development, 1(2), 284-287. doi: 10.1002/jid.3380010208.
[5] Daly, H.E. (1991). Sustainable development: From concept and theory towards operational principles. Population and Development Review, 16, 25-43. doi: 10.2307/2808061.
[6] Galchynsky, A.S. (2009). Crises and cycles of world development. Kyiv: ADEF-Ukraine.
[7] Georgescu-Roegen, N. (2011). From bioeconomics to degrowth. London: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.4324/9780203830413.
[8] Kazemikhasragh, A., & Buoni Pineda, M.V. (2023). Fiscal space policies for sustainable development and debt relief: Empirical analysis in West African countries. New Global Studies, 17(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1515/ngs-2021-0040.
[9] Kharazishvili, Y., Lyashenko, V., Grishnova, O., Hutsaliuk, O., Petrova, I., & Kalinin, O. (2023). Modeling of priority institutional measures to overcome threats to sustainable development of the region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1269(1), article number 012023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1269/1/012023.
[10] Kolodiziev, O., Tyschenko, V., & Azizova, K. (2017). Project finance risk management for public-private partnership. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(4), 171-180. doi: 10.21511/imfi.14(4).2017.14.
[11] López-Concepción, A., Gil-Lacruz, A.I., Saz-Gil, I., Garcia-Madurga, M.Á., & Sánchez-Medalón, I. (2024). What are the factors that most influence the formation of workers’ labor values in order to achieve sustainable development in Latin America? Business Strategy and the Environment. doi: 10.1002/bse.3737.
[12] Macroeconomic indicators. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/macro-indicators.
[13] Malyarets, L.M., Barannik, I.O., Sabadash, L.O., & Grynko, P.O. (2019). Modeling the economic sustainability of the macro system (for example Ukraine). Montenegrin Journal of Economic, 14(3), 23-35. doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-3.2.
[14] Mazhara, G., Pyshnograiev, I., & Zavalna, M. (2023). Scenario modeling of the critical macroeconomic and sustainable development indicators of Ukraine. E3S Web of Conferences, 408, article number 01019. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202340801019.
[15] Melnyk, A.O. (2014). World economic crisis: Theory and methodology. Kyiv: Institute of Agrarian Economics.
[16] Paridhi, P., & Ritika, R. (2024). Sustainability reporting for boosting national commitment and overcoming challenges: A hierarchical model. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), article number e334. doi: 10.1002/bsd2.334.
[17] Pokorný, J., & Palacká, A. (2023). Well-being as a prerequisite for sustainability on a macroeconomic scale? Case of V4 countries. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(3), 141-153. doi: 10.12776/QIP.V27I3.1945.
[18] Proença, S., & Soukiazis, E. (2023). The process of sustainable entrepreneurship: A multi-country analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 10995-11010. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02515-z.
[19] Ramazanov, S.K., Burbelo, O.A., & Vitlinskyi, V.V. (2012). Risks, security, crises and sustainable development in the economy. Methodologies, models, decision-making and management methods. Luhansk: Knowledge.
[20] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
[21] The 17 goals. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
[22] Tokhtyyeva, Z., Kurbanova, I., Abdyzhusupova, A., & Savin, V. (2024). The human factor in the development of a green economy in the Kyrgyz Republic. BIO Web of Conferences, 83, article number 07003. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20248307003.
[23] Wang, R., Laila, U., Nazir, R., & Hao, X. (2023). Unleashing the influence of industrialization and trade openness on renewable energy intensity using path model analysis: A roadmap towards sustainable development. Renewable Energy, 202, 280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.035.
[24] Weng, D., & Xia, Q. (2023). Nexus between financial inclusion and natural resource management: How human development affects the sustainability practices. Geological Journal, 58(12), 4596-4609. doi: 10.1002/gj.4862.
[25] World economic situation and prospects as of mid-2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-as-of-mid-2024/.
[26] Zhao, X., Gao, Y., Hou, Y., Albasher, G., & Bu, F. (2024). Addressing the resource curse: Empirical analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for sustainable development. Resources Policy, 88, article number 104454. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104454.